This study is to prove that Chang`s educational theory has abundant academic implications for Levinas` ethics of the Other. According to Levinas, the other person is not reduced to the self and cannot be made into an object of the self, as is done by traditional western philosophy. The other person as he comes before me in a face to face encounter is not an alter ego. He is far from me and other than myself, a stranger. I have metaphysical desire toward the other person to transcend me and my self-centered finite world. The other person teaches that I have the ethical responsibilities for him. Typical ethical relation can be found in the relationship between Father and son. Education is actualized between the more advanced and the less advanced. I and the other person must be classified into the master and pupil with reference to their transtalents. Master as the other person of pupil has the educational responsibility to teach and pupil as the other person of master has the responsibility to learn. Their responsibilities cannot be reduced to each other. Master can be educationally incarnated in his pupil by making pupil as his another self and he can live forever through his pupils` future. This educational relationship discovered by Chang`s educational theory is more typical as the relationship between self and the other than Levinas` ethical relationship. The main conclusion of this study is that autonomous educational theory is possible and make academic contributions to other disciplines.