Human beings is Homo religiosus. As we know, God is undefinable. Although it is unknowable, it is not concrete but real. In this respect, we have rather to appreciate those religious world.
But education is, we would discuss, relied on modem message. In this paradigm educational theory and practice in founded on the discourse of modernity and its self -understandings have forged by that discourse’s basic and implicit assumption. The very rationale of the educational process and the role of education is ratio-motivated, ratio-directing, and ratio-managing by rational subject. Undoubtedly, then, there are problems confronting those that is deeply embedded notions of foundations, disciplines and scientificity.
Openness to the possibility of human beings on ultimate truth is a necessary component of religion. This is spirituality of spiritus or Ruach. Religion attempts institutionalize spirituality and in many instances this is done for the perpetuation of the sacred topos rather then profane topos. Because human beings live between sacred and profane interchangeably. This dynamic openness is evident in the diverse expressions of the human spirit seen in many religions of the world. It is also manifest in the various expressions of spirituality outside modem ratio. An education concerned with questions of religious truth must accept the fact that religion is a fundamental reality per se. Such receptivity of religion is grounded in the post-modern desire. Ours cherished fore-structures of understanding in modem ratio is challenged by religio as a means of guiding the pilgrimage towards an appropriate relationship with the ultimate order-of-things. The impact of post-modernity on the legacy of modernity has much to teach us now. Specially we can note the danger of a narrowly conceived modem education’s theory and practice. Our exploration of the interface between religion and education has produced a high viewpoint of education. The open ultimate order-of-things has much to teach the religiosus: “relegere ergo sum.”