본 연구는 2000년부터 2012년까지 국내 조직성과 측정에 활용된 측정변인들을 살펴봄으로써 향후 조직성과 측정변인의 보다 폭넓은 활용 및 발전을 위한 기초자료를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이 연구를 통해 도출한 결론은 다음과 같다. 본 연구에 분석된 41편의 논문 중 33편의 논문이 주관적 측정방법만을 활용하여 성과를 측정한 것으로 나타나 국내에서는 조직성과를 측정하는데 있어 상당수의 연구자가 주관적 측정방법을 활용하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 조직성과의 주관적 측정방법 중 대다수의 연구자가 직무만족, 조직몰입, 이직의도, BSC 등을 주요 변인으로 측정하고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 바탕으로 몇 가지 시사점을 제안하였다.
The purpose of this study was to examine recent research trends about organizational performance variables by investigating empirical articles published in Korea from 2000 to 2012. In this study, we critically analyzed 41 studies on organizational performance variables from academic journals. The findings of this study were as follows. First, we recognized the only 37 studies use subjective measurements for investigating the organizational performances. In Korea studies, it was more likely to use subjective measurements than studies were conducted in foreign journals where were more focused on proving direct impact of organizational variables. Second, we found that job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, BSC, and quasi-objective measures had been addressed as variables of organizational performance in most studies. Also, it was showed that even subjective measurement investigated organizational performance through the indirect variables, compared with foreign studies to explore the perception of organizational members about actual business results. Because pattern of result favored the use of subjective measure in Korea studies, finally, the authors conclude that it is necessary to use more objective measure of organizational performance as method of appropriately aligning what intend to measure and what actually to be measured.
Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 Ⅲ. 연구 방법 Ⅳ. 연구 방법 Ⅴ. 결 론
