기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
職種別 行政責任者 意思決定過程에 있어서의 冒險敢行水準 比較硏究
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 職種別 行政責任者 意思決定過程에 있어서의 冒險敢行水準 比較硏究
  • A Comparative Study of Risk Taking in Decision Making by the Administrators of the Selected Professions
저자명
王基恒
간행물명
교육학연구KCI
권/호정보
1975년|13권 3호(통권25호)|pp.128-137 (10 pages)
발행정보
한국교육학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR| 이미지(6.19MB)
주제분야
교육학
서지반출

영문초록

Decision making is the core and the heart of administration and administrative process both in theory and practice. It guides the administrative behavior to achieve the goals. To decide which of the effective alternatives to adopt among various and complex alternatives involves inevitably some extent of risks. Devision making depends heavily upon the abilities and risk taking level of the decision maker, because of his own incompleteness of knowledge, difficulties of anticipating events to be happen. This study intended to examine the variables influencing the selecting the alternatives to adopt under the condition of unpredictable events and their unanticipative consequences. The relationships between risk taking and the variables such as the personality dispositions, jobs, educational levels, and age were and age were analyzed respectively by statistical method. The results of the study were as follows: 1. The relationship between risk. taking and personality dispositions. In the risk levels when the risky alternatives and safe alternatives with the same gain-loss probability were presented to choose the one to the subjeects of this research. A. No significant defference between the high and the low score group in risk taking. B. No significant difference between the high and the low score group in emotional stability. C. No significant difference between the high and the low score group in selfsufficiency. D. No significant difference between the high and the low score group in selfcontrol. 2. The relationship between risk taking and jobs. Business, military, and police were high in risk taking while the educational finance were low in terms of mean score. Nonetheless, the statistical test proved the difference between the jobs negative. 3. The relationship between risk taking and schooling. The difference between those who received the higher education and those who did not were proved negative. The level of schooling and the level of risk taking were not correlated. 4. The relationship between risk taking and age. With regard to age difference, the young men were higher than the old man in choosing the safe alternatives rather than the risky ones. But none of the correlations achieved statistical significance. As the conclusion of this research, it might be said that the variables such as the job, personality, age, and schooling of the decision maker rarely influenced the level of risk taking in choosing the behavior alternatives to achieve certain goals. And the statistical analyses proved that the personaity dispositions like emotional stability, venturesomeness, self-sufficiency, and self-control were not correlated with risk taking, either.

목차

1. 論題의 提起
2. 理論的 背景
3. 硏究의 方法
4. 結果 및 解釋
5. 論議 및 結論
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉

구매하기 (3,000)