기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
유아의 사건표상이 또래문제해결력에 미치는 영향
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 유아의 사건표상이 또래문제해결력에 미치는 영향
  • The Effects of Event Representation upon Peer Problem Solving Ability
ㆍ 저자명
김세리,이강이
ㆍ 간행물명
인간발달연구KCI
ㆍ 권/호정보
2013년|20권 4호(통권56호)|pp.1-22 (22 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
한국인간발달학회|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.39MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
사회과학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 유아의 또래문제해결력이 유아의 연령과 성별에 따라 어떠한 양상을 보이는지 살펴보고||| 사건 표상이 유아의 연령과 성별 및 사건의 경험 유무에 따라 어떠한 양상을 보이는지 살펴보고자 하였다. 그 리고 유아의 또래문제해결력과 사건표상의 관계를 알아보고||| 사건표상이 또래문제해결력에 미치는 상대 적 영향력을 알아보고자 하였다. 서울에 위치한 어린이집에 재원 중인 3세 유아 48명(남아 25명||| 여아 23 명)||| 5세 유아 50명(남아 26명 여아 24명)||| 총 98명을 대상으로 또래문제해결력과 사건표상 검사를 실시하 였다. 수집된 자료를 SPSS Win 18.0 프로그램에서 빈도||| 평균||| 표준편차||| t검증||| 이원변량분석||| 혼합변량분 석||| 상관관계분석||| 위계적 회귀분석을 이용하여 통계 처리하였다. 그 결과||| 첫째||| 유아의 또래문제해결력 의 경우 5세아가 3세아에 비해 가설적인 또래문제 상황에 대해 공동적이고 상호적인 문제해결력을 보였 으며 성별에 따른 차이는 보이지 않았다. 둘째||| 유아의 사건표상 하위 항목인 사건재인||| 사건배열 모두 5 세아가 3세아에 비해 사건과 관련된 내용과 순서를 더 잘 알고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째||| 유아의 또래 문제해결력은 사건표상 중 경험사건 재인과 가장 높은 상관을 보이며 경험사건 재인에 직접적인 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 통해 사건표상이 유아의 또래문제해결력에 미치는 영향력을 확인 함으로써 유아의 또래관계 질을 향상시키는 데에 필요한 사회인지적 요소로 사건표상의 의미를 살펴본 데에 의의가 있다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate 3||| 5-year-old children’s peer problem solving ability and their event representation according to their age and gender||| and (2) to investigate the effects of event representation upon peer problem solving ability. The participants for this study consisted of 98 children||| aged 3- and 5-year-olds from child-care centers in Seoul||| Korea. Each child participated in the event representation test and peer problem solving test through the use of pictures. Statistical methods used for data analysis were frequencies||| percentiles||| means||| standard deviations||| t-tests||| ANOVAs||| Pearson’s correlations and hierarchical regression. The major findings were as follows. First||| there was a significant difference in children’s peer problem solving ability depending on their age. Second||| there was a significant difference in children’s event representation according to their age. Third||| the children’s event representation was positively related to peer problem solving ability||| and the results of hierarchical multiple regression suggested that peer problem solving ability had an strong effect upon experienced event recognition. These findings suggest that experienced event representation is the most strongly influencing factor||| therefore||| activities using event representation can help children’s peer problem solving abilities.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 해석
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

키워드

또래문제해결력사건표상사건재인사건배열경험사건미경험사건peer problem solvingevent recognitionevent sequenceevent representationexperienced event

참고문헌 (62건)

  • 김경양, 박은혜 (2001). 스크립트활동을 이용한 AAC 중재가 중도장애 아동의 의사소통기능 습득에 미치는 영향. 언어청각장애연구, 6(2), 331-354.
  • 김선주 (2002). 유아의 정서지능과 대인간 문제해결 능력간의 관계. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  • 성미영 (2002). 과제 상황별 유아의 스크립트 지식과 주제 수행 기술 및 스크립트 향상 훈련 효과 - 저소득층 유아와 중류층 유아의 비교. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  • 성미영 (2006). 유아의 대인간 문제해결 전략과 유아의 정서성, 정서지식, 사건지식의 관계. 대한가정학회지, 44(5), 59-68.
  • 송미선 (2001). 또래갈등상황에서의 유아의 전략, 사회적 행동특성, 그리고 또래수용도와의 관계. 아동학회지, 22(3), 229-239.
  • 엄정원 (2008). 유아의 마음 이론 및 대인간 문제해결 전략과 또래수용의 관계. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  • 이강이, 성미영 (2003). 유아의 정서지식과 대인간 문제해결 전략-시설보호 유아와 일반 유아의 비교. 아동학회지, 24(1), 33-45.
  • 이영자, 이종숙, 신은수 (2002). 가장놀이의 주제, 자기-타인관계, 탈맥락화의 발달: 놀이영역과 성별에 따른 차이. 교육연구, 10, 29-51.
  • 유연옥 (2001). 인지발달. 서울: 학지사.
  • 정옥분, Rubin, K. H., 박성연, 윤종희, 도현심, 김경은 (2011). 영아기 정서와 기질, 유아기 어머니의 긍정적 양육태도와 4세 유아의 또래상호작용의 질. 인간발달연구, 18(1), 151-168.
  • 최인숙 (2009). 사회정보처리 구성요소와 정서요인이 유아의 공격성에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  • Asher, S. R., & Renshaw, P. D. (1981). Children without friends: Social knowledge and social skill training. In S. R. Asher & J. M. Gottman (Eds.), The development of children‘s friendships (pp.273-296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Astington, J. W. (2003). The future of theory-of-mind research: Understanding motivational states. Child Development, 72(3), 685-687.
  • Badenes, L. V., Estevan, R. A. C., & Bacete, F. J. G. (2000). Theory of mind and peer rejection at school. Social Development, 9, 271-283.
  • Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1989). One thing follows another: Effects of temporal structure on 1-2-year-olds recall of events. Developmental Psychology, 25, 197-206.
  • Bauer, P. J., & Mandler, J. M. (1990). Remembering what happened next: Very young children’s recall of event sequences. In R. Fivush & J. A. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp.9-29). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Black, B., & Logan, A. (1995). Links between communication patterns in mother-child, father-child, and child-peer interaction and children’s social status. Child Development, 66, 255-271.
  • Bretherton, I. (1984). Representing the social world in symbolic play: Reality and fantasy. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play (pp.1-39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Bretherton, I., Fritz, J., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Ridgeway, D. (1986). Learning to talk about emotions: A functionalist perspective. Child Development, 57, 529-548.
  • Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61(4), 1101-1111.
  • Chen, D. W., Fein, G. G., Killen, M., & Tam, H. P. (2001). Peer conflicts of preschool children: Issues, resolution, incidence, and age-related patterns. Early Education & Development, 12(4). 523-544.
  • Chen, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2000). Across the great divide: Bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers’ and older children’s thinking. [Monograph] The Society for Research in Child Development, 65(2, Serial No. 261).
  • Chung, T. Y., & Asher, S. R. (1996). Children’s goals and strategies in peer conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 42(1), 125-147.
  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information- processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74- 101.
  • Denham, S. A., Mckinley, M., Couchoud, E. A., & Holt, R. (1990). Emotional and behavioral predictors of preschool peer ratings. Child Development, 61(4), 1145-1152.
  • Doctoroff, S. (1997). Sociodramatic script training and peer role prompting: Two tactics to promote sociodramatic play and peer interaction. Early Child Development and Care, 136(1), 27-43.
  • Dodge, K. A., & Rabiner, D. L. (2004). Returning to roots: On social information processing and moral development. Child Development, 75 (4), 1003-1008.
  • Eisenberg, A. R., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4(2), 149-170.
  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665-697.
  • Fivush, R., & Mandler, J. M. (1985). Developmental changes in the understanding of temporal sequence. Child Development, 56, 1436-1446.
  • Galejs, I., Dhawan, G., & King, A. (1983). Popularity and communication skills of preschool children. The Journal of Psychology, 115, 89-95.
  • Ginsberg, J. P., & Golbeck, S. L. (2004). Thoughts on the future of research on mathematics and science learning and education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 190-200.
  • Goldstein, H., & Cisar, C. L. (1992). Promoting interaction during sociodramatic play: Teaching scripts to typical preschoolers and classmates with disabillities. Journal of Application Behavioral Anaylisys, 25(2). 265-280.
  • Goncu, A. (1987). Toward an interactional model of developmental changes in social pretend play. In L. Katz (Ed.), Current topics in early childhood education (pp.108-125). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Green, V. A., & Cllessen, A. H. N. (2008). Achievement versus maintenance of control in six-year-old children’s interactions with peers: An observational study. Educational Psychology, 28(2), 1-20.
  • Green, V. A., Cllessen, A. H. N., Rechis, R., Patterson, M. M., & Hughes, J. M. (2008). Social problem solving and strategy use in young children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(1), 92-11.
  • Hartup, W. W., Cillessen, A. H. N., van IJzendoorn, H. W., & van Lieshout, C. F. M. (1992). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys: Subtypes and stabilities. Child Development, 63, 893-905.
  • Hubbard, J. A. (2001). Emotion expression processes in children’s peer interaction: The role of peer rejection, aggression, and gender. Child Development, 72(5), 1426-1438.
  • Hughes, F. P. (2010). Children, play, development (4th ed.). LA: Sage Publication Inc.
  • Katz, L. F., Kramer, L., & Gottman, J. M. (1992). Conflict and emotions in martial, sibling, and peer relationships. In C. U. Shatnz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp.122-149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kupersmidt, J. B., & Coie, J. D. (1990). Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence. Child Development, 61(5), 1350-1362.
  • Malloy, H., & McMurray, P. (1996). Conflict strategies and resolution: Peer conflict in an integrated early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 185-206.
  • Marsh, D. T. (1982). The development of interpersonal problem solving among elementary school children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 140, 107-118.
  • Myles-Worsley, M., Cromer, C. C., & Dodd, D. H. (1986). Children’s preschool script reconstruction: Reliance on general knowledge as memory fades. Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 22-30.
  • Nelson, K. (1986). Event knowledge: Structure and function in deveopment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1981). Generalized event representations: Basic building blocks of cognitive development. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology (vol. 1, pp.21-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1986). Children’s scripts. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp.21-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nelson, K., & Seidman, S. (1984). Playing with scripts. In I. Bretherton (Ed.), Symbolic play: The development of social understanding (pp. 45-71). NY: Academic Press.
  • Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (2002). Mindreading and moral awareness in popular and rejected preschoolers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 205-224.
  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Shantz, C. U. (1987). Conflicts between children. Children Development, 59(2), 283-305.
  • Shure, M., & Spivack, G. (1970). Cognitive problem-solving skills, adjustment and social class. Research and evaluation reports. Philadelphia: Department of Mental Health Sciences. Hahnemann Medical College and Hospital.
  • Slackman, E., Hudson, J., & Fivush, R. (1986). Actions, actors, links, and goals: The structure of children’s event representation. In K. Nelson (Ed.), Event knowledge: Structure and function in development (pp.47-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Spivack, G., Platt, J. J., & Shure, M. B. (1974) Social adjustment of young children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ungerer, J. A. (1985, 4). The development of script knoweldge in children from 18 to 30 months of age. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.
  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Walker, S., Irving, K., & Berthelsen, D. (2002). Gender influence on preschool children’s social problem-solving strategies. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 197-209.
  • Webster-Stratton, C. (1990). Wally Game: A problem-solving test. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington, Seattle.
  • Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (1997). Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: A comparison of child and parent training interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 93-109.
  • Wellman, H. M., & Lagattuta, K. H. (2004). Theory of mind for learning and teaching: The nature and role of explanation. Cognitive Development, 19(4), 479-497.
  • Youngstrom, E., Wolpaw, J. M., Kogos, J, L., Schoff, K., Ackerman, B., & Izard, C. (2000). Interpersonal problem solving in preschool and first grade: Developmental changes and ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(4), 589-602.
  • Youniss, J. (1980). Parents and peers in social devleopment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
구매하기 (5,100)
장바구니
추천 연관논문