기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
How College Students’ Partisanship Affects Their Attitudes Toward Political Ads : The Case of the 2012 General Election in South Korea
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • How College Students’ Partisanship Affects Their Attitudes Toward Political Ads : The Case of the 2012 General Election in South Korea
  • 대학생의 정당 지지도가 정치광고에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향 : 2012년 대한민국 총선 사례를 중심으로
저자명
Cunhyeong Ci,Jinbong Choi
간행물명
광고PR실학연구KCI
권/호정보
2014년|7권 1호(통권14호)|pp.109-137 (29 pages)
발행정보
한국광고PR실학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.86MB)
주제분야
사회과학
서지반출

영문초록

Researchers have typically defined voters’ partisanship as their belonging to a particular party. Alternatively, however, recent researchers have viewed voters’ partisanship as their attitudes toward a party that can range in magnitude. Accordingly, this study examined (1) whether South Korean college students’ attitudes toward political ads can be affected by their attitudes toward the parties and (2) whether the relationship can be moderated by their expectations of the election outcome for the parties and perceived importance of the issues addressed in the ads. Several hypotheses were proposed based on literature review and tested through a survey in the context of the 2012 general election in South Korea. It was found from the test that South Korean college students tended to have positive attitudes toward the political ads of the parties toward which they have positive attitudes as hypothesized. Different from the hypothesis, however, such an impact was not moderated by their expectations of the election outcome, with an exception of those who supported a progressive party but had positive expectations of a conservative party. Lastly, the hypothesis that the impact would be moderated by their importance perception of the issues addressed in the political ads showed. a mixed outcome. Based on the result, suggestions were made for more effective use of political ads and future studies.

국문초록

기존 연구들은 유권자의 정당지지도를 해당 정당에 대한 소속의식으로 정의하였다. 그러나 최근 연구들은 유권자의 정당지지도를 해당 정당에 대한 태도로 정의하고 있으며, 이에 따라 가부가 아닌 정도의 차이를 나타내는 개념으로 이해하고 있다. 이러한 견해를 바탕으로 본 연구는 (1) 한국 대학생들의 정치광과에 대 한 태도가 정당지지도에 의해 영향 받는지, 그리고 (2) 이러한 영향관계가 해당 정당의 선거결과에 대한 예 상과 해당 광고에서 제시하고 있는 이슈의 중요성에 대한 인식에 의해 조절되는지 분석하였다. 이를 위해 기존 논문을 바탕으로 가설들을 수립하고, 2012년 총선상황에서 서베이를 실시하여 이를 검증하였다. 검 증 결과 가설에서 예측한대로 한국 대학생들은 긍정적 태도를 갖고 있는 정당의 정치광고에 대해 긍정적 태 도를 갖는 경향이 있었다. 그러나 가설과는 달리 이러한 경향성은 진보정당에 대해 긍정적 태도를 갖고 있 는 동시에 보수정당이 승리할 것으로 예상한 대학생들의 경우에만 조절되었다. 마지막으로 이러한 경향성 이 해당 광고에서 제시하고 있는 이슈의 중요성에 대한 인식에 의해 조절될 것이라는 가설은 혼재된 결과를 보였다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 정치광고의 효과적 사용과 후속연구에 대한 의견을 제시하였다.

목차

Introduction
Conceptual framework
Method
Result
Discussion
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (38건)

  • Alesina, A. (1988). Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters. American Economic Review, 78, 796∼805.
  • Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison. (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798∼844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
  • Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
  • Babad, E., & Yacobos, E. (1993). Wish and reality in voters’ predictions of election outcomes. Political Psychology, 14(1), 37∼54.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191∼215.
  • Belanger, E., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27, 477∼491.
  • Belknap, G., & Campbell, A. (1952). Political party identification and attitudes toward foreign policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 601∼623.
  • Budge, I., & Farlie, D. J. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1954). The voter decides. Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston: IL.
  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Chang, C. (2003). Party bias in political-advertising processing. Journal of Advertising, 52(2), 55∼67.
  • Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: a report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289∼314.
  • Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891∼913.
  • Finkel, S. E. (1993), Reexamining the “Minimal Effects” model in recent presidential campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 55(1), 1∼21.
  • Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 535∼542.
  • Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393∼403.
  • Greene, S. (2002). The social-psychological measurement of partisanship. Political Behavior, 24(3), 171∼197.
  • Jones, R. A. (1977). Self-fulfilling prophecies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kaid, L. L., & Postelnicu, M. (2005). Political advertising in the 2004 election: Comparison of traditional television and Internet messages. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), 265∼278.
  • Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
  • Kaid, L. L., Postelnicu, M., Landreville, K., Yun, H. J., & LeGrange, A. G. (2007). The effects of political advertising on young voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1137∼1151.
  • Kim, K. (2008). The use of media and the voting behavior in voters of university students. 언론과학연구, 8(4), 187∼221.
  • Kruglanski, A. (1980). Lay epistemologic process and contents. Psychological Review, 87, 70∼87.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1946). Mutual effects of statistical variables. In P. Lazarsfeld, A. Pasanalla, & M. Rosenberg. (Eds.), Contributions in the language of social research. New York: Free Press.
  • Lee, S. (2006). The assertive nationalism of South Korean youth: Cultural dynamism and political activism. SAIS Review, 26(2), 123∼132.
  • Lee, S. & Kim, H. (2005). A study on the candidate political advertising of the 17th national assembly election. 홍보학연구, 9(1), 102∼125.
  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098∼2109.
  • Miller, W. E., & Shanks, J. M. (1996). The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Min, Y. (2006). The effects of political advertising on issue salience and candidate preference. 한국언론학보, 50(5), 108∼131.
  • Murphy, K. (2000, April 25). Report: young voters, candidates share blame for apathy. http://www.kcstar.com
  • Park, S. & Sung, D. (2005). Study on the impact that a media credibility influences on the political efficacy and voting action: with a focus on political participation of the university students. 한국언론학보, 49(4), 110∼222.
  • Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825∼850.
  • Rosema, M. (2006). Partisanship, candidate evaluations, ad prospective voting. Electoral Studies, 25, 467∼488.
  • Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279∼-301.
  • Shin, I. G., Lee, B., & Cho, B. (2008). The effect of the types of negative political advertising and the level of audiences’ advertising skepticism on sponsored candidates evaluation and voting intention. 한국광고홍보학보, 10(3), 224∼247.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparisons. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. xx-xxx). London: Academic Press.
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S., & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7∼24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
구매하기 (5,800)
추천 연관논문