잘 노는 성인의 심리 행동 특성 연구

조미정; 최태산

서지반출

국문초록

본 연구에서는 잘 노는 성인의 심리?행동적 특성을 밝히기 위해 대학생 1-2학년 154명을 대상으로 자유 응답식 질문지를 배부, 수거하고, 상담전공 대학원생과 현직 상담원을 대상 으로 초점 집단 면접을 실시하였다. 수집된 자료는 내용 분석하여 Glynn(1991), Glynn과 Webster(1992), Schaefer와 Greenberg(1997), Barnett(2007), 이훈, 조희범, 이영진(2010)의 놀이성 하위구성요소를 참조하여 분류하였다. 그 결과 잘 노는 성인의 심리, 행동적 특성은 행동적, 인지적, 정서?사회적 차원으로 구분되었고, 행동적 특성은 익살스러운 행동, 즉흥 충동성, 욕구행동 일치성, 재미와 즐거움 추구, 새로움 추구, 신체적 표현성, 적극 활동성, 기교성 등 으로 나타났다. 인지적 특성은 기발성, 상상력, 순발력, 몰입성, 비형식성으로 분류되었고, 정서?사회적 놀이 특성은 낙관성, 정서표현성, 활력 회복성, 친화성, 주도성으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 밝혀진 모든 놀이성의 하위 요소들은 여러 선행 연구자들의 구성요소와 모두 부분적으로 일치함을 확인할 수 있었다. 또한 본 연구에서 얻어진 결과는 미국의 성인 대상 놀이성 연구자들이 밝힌 구인들의 범주보다 다양하게 구분하여 재구조화 하였다는 점에서 시사점이 있다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychological and behavioral characteristics of well-playful adults. For the purposes of data collection, open-ended questionnaires were distributed to the 154 college students of grades 1-2 and focus group interviews, targeting the graduate students majoring in counseling and the currently practicing counselors were conducted. The data was content-analyzed and classified with reference to the sub-factors of playfulness as studied by Glynn(1991), Glynn & Webster(1992), Schaefer & Greenberg(1997), Barnett(2007) and Hoon Lee & Hee- Beom Jo, Young-Jin-Lee(2010). As a result, the psychological and behavioral characteristics of well-playful adults were categorized into the three dimensions- behavioral, cognitive and emotional-social. The behavioral dimension included farcical, extemporal impulsive, the congruency of appetitive behavior, the pursuit of fun and joy, the pursuit of novelty, physical expressiveness, aggressive activity, technique, etc. The cognitive dimension consisted of extraordinariness, imagination, quickness, immersion and informality. The emotional-social dimension involved optimism, emotional expressiveness, the recovery of vitality, affinity and leading. All sub-components of playfulness identified by this study partially corresponded to those uncovered in the results by the preceding research. And also, the results from this study have a meaning that it classifies and reconstructs the categorization of the factors more variously than those of American research targeting adults.

키워드

성인 놀이성 행동적 특성 인지적 특성 정서?사회적 특성 adults playfulness behavioral characteristics cognitive characteristics emotional-social characteristics

참고문헌 (26건)

노안영, 정 민 (2007). 자기격려-낙담 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(3), 675-692.
방은령 (2009). 놀이의 의미와 치료 및 성장을 위한 활용. 놀이치료학회지, 12(4), 281-297.
배미랑 (2011). 청소년의 놀이특성 분석: 광주와 전남지역의 중․고등학생을 중심으로. 동신대학교 사회개발대학원 석사학위논문.
오혜주, 유미숙, 조유진 (2010). 어머니의 놀이성 평가 척도 개발을 위한 예비연구(만 3-8세 아동 어머니를 대상으로). 인간발달연구. 17(1), 349-362.
이 훈, 조희범, 이영진 (2010). 성인의 놀이성 지표 개발. 한국관광학회, 34(9), 165-188.
조미정 (2008). 학령기 아동의 놀이성 연구. 한국놀이치료학회, 11(1), 17-30.
Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3(4), 319-336.
Barnett, L. A. (1991). Characterizing playfulness: Correlates with individual attributes and personality traits. Play & Culture, 4(4), 371- 393.
Barnett, L. A. (2007). The nature of playfulness in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 949-958.
Barnett, L. A., & Kleiber, D. A. (1984) Playfulness and the early environment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144, 153-164.
Bozionelos, N., & Bozionelos, G. (1999). Playfulness: Its relationship with instrumental and expressive traits. Personality and Individuals Differences. 26, 749-760.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Glynn, M. A. (1991). Framing tasks: The effects of work and play cues on task motivation, evaluations, and information processing. New Haven, Conn: Yale School of Organization and Management.
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71, 83-103.
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1993). Refining the nomological net of the adult playfulness scale: Personality, motivational, and attitudinal correlates for highly intelligent adults. Psychological Reports, 72, 1023-1206.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press
Huizinga, J. (1993). 호모루덴스. 김윤수(역). 서울: 까치글방. (원본 발간일, 1955)
Kagan, J. (2003). Behavioral inhibition as a temperamental category. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith. Handbook of aﬀective sciences (pp. 320-331). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lieberman, J. N. (1965). Playfulness and divergent thinking: An investigation of their relationship at the kindergarten level. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 107(2), 219-224.
Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York: Academic Press.
Miller, S. (1973) Ends, means, and galumphing: Some leitmotifs of play. American Anthropologist, 75, 87-89.
Schaefer, C., & Greenberg, R. (1997). Measurement of playfulness: A neglected therapist variable. International Journal of Play Therapy, 6(2), 21- 31.
Singer, D. L., & Rummo, J. (1973) Ideational creativity and behavioral style in kindergarten- age children. Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 154-161.
Staempfli, M. B. (2007). Adolescent playfulness, stress perception, coping and well being. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(3), 393- 412.
Starbuck, W. H., & Webster, J. (1991). When is play productive? Accounting, Management, and Informational Technology, 1, 71-90.
Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1992) Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly, 16, 201-226.

구매하기 (4,900)

장바구니

국문초록

영문초록

목차

키워드

참고문헌 (26건)