관계적 공격성에 대한 국내 연구동향 분석: 2000년∼2013년

최지영; 배라영

서지반출

국문초록

이 연구의 목적은 관계적 공격성에 대한 국내연구의 동향을 알아보고자 함에 있다. 이를 위 해 2000년부터 2013년까지의 한국연구재단 등재후보지이상의 학술지논문과 석?박사학위논문 97편을 대상으로 연구분야, 연구대상, 연구방법(자료수집방법, 평정방법, 분석방법, 측정도구), 연구변인, 연구결과에 따라 분석하였다. 이 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 연도별 연 구논문은 2000년에 시작하여 2010년을 기점으로 급격히 증가하였고, 연구분야는 교육학이 가 장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 연구대상은 초등학생을 대상으로 한 연구가 가장 많았으며 그 다 음이 유아, 중학생 순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 연구방법에서 자료수집방법은 질문지법을 사용한 자기보고식 연구가 가장 많이 이루어졌고, 분석방법은 전체적으로는 회귀분석이 가장 많이 사용되었으나, 2011년부터 구조방정식 모형검증이 많이 사용되었으며, 질적분석은 2007년부터 나타났다. 측정도구는 Peer Conflict Scale(Marsee, Kimons, & Frick, 2004)이 가장 많이 사용되었다. 셋째, 가장 많이 다루어진 연구주제는 관계적 공격성 가해자의 정서발달과 관련된 내용이었 고 주요변인에 따른 특징을 기술하였다. 마지막으로 연구결과의 의의와 시사점을 논의하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the recent trends of research on relational aggression in Korea. Ninety seven documents including journal articles, thesis and dissertations published from 2000 to 2013 in Korea were reviewed in terms of the researchers’ academic backgrounds, participants, research methodology (data collection, data analysis, instruments), main variables, and results, amongst other considerations. These studies were summarized into several categories as follows. First, most of the research was carried out by researchers in the field of education. Second, research in this area has been intensive since 2010, compared to the early 2000s. Third, many studies targeted students in elementary school, followed by children, and then students in middle school. Fourth, self-reporting measures using questionnaires were the most commonly used tools in the studies followed by interview methods and participant observations. Fifth, regression analysis was the most commonly used data analysis method. However, qualitative analysis was utilized in 2007 and the structural equation modeling method has been used since 2011. Sixth, the major variables in the research were firstly related to emotional development followed by family relationships. The implications of the research results were also discussed.

키워드

관계적 공격성 관계적 공격행동 연구동향 정서발달 relational aggression relationally aggressive behavior research trend emotional development

참고문헌 (51건)

곽금주, 윤 진, 문은영 (1993). 한국 청소년 비행 연구의 동향과 심리학적 과제. 한국심리학회지: 사회, 7(1), 12-27.
김동배, 민정선, 정규형 (2012). 시설거주 노인의 관계적 공격성이 우울감에 미치는 영향-기초생활수급권자 입소노인을 중심으로. 사회복지연구, 43(1), 203-227.
김지선 (2000). 청소년비행연구 동향에 대한 수량적 고찰. 청소년학연구, 7(2), 183-219.
문용린, 최지영, 백수현, 김영주 (2007). 학교폭력 발생과정에 대한 남녀 차이 분석: 피해자 상담사례분석을 중심으로. 교육심리연구, 21(3), 703-722.
박민정, 최보가 (2004). 청소년의 관계적 공격성에 영향을 미치는 생태학적 변인들. 한국가정관리학회지, 22(4), 95-104.
박혜경 (2002). 아버지의 양육행동 및 남아의 정서조절능력과 공격성 간의 관계. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
서미정 (2011). 아동과 청소년의 외현적, 관계적 공격성의 성별 차이 및 관련변인에 대한 메타분석. 아동학회지, 32(3), 143-162.
심희옥 (2007). 또래 괴롭힘과 외현과 관계적 공격성에 관한 횡단 및 종단연구: 성별을 중심으로. 한국생활과학지, 16(6), 1107- 1118.
이승연 (2011). 초등학생의 공격성과 사회적 선호도, 지각된 인기도의 관계: 친사회적 행동과 사회적 유능성의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 8(2), 153-173.
이춘아 (2001). 청소년의 또래공격성과 피공격성. 전남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
임정하, 윤정진 (2010). 부부갈등이 아동에게 미치는 영향에 관한 국내 연구 동향. 인간발달연구, 17(1), 263-284.
정옥분, 정순화, 김경은, 박연정 (2008). 국내 집단따돌림 관련연구의 경향분석, 인간발달연구, 15(1), 115-137.
조남정, 최은미, 최희진, 장선철 (2010). 상담학의 연구동향 분석: 상담학연구 학회지 게재논문(창간년도∼2009). 상담학연구, 11(2), 507-524.
하문선, 김지현 (2013). 한국 초기 청소년 공격성척도(K-PCS)타당화 연구. 한국청소년연구, 24(1). 71-101.
한영경 (2008). 중학생의 관계적 공격성에 영향을 주는 개인 내적요인. 아주대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
Andreou, E., & Bonoti, F. (2010). Children’s bullying experiences expressed through drawings and self-reports. School Psychology International, 31(2), 164-177.
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
Banny, A. M., Heilbron, N., Ames, A., & Prinstein, M. (2011). Relational benefits of relational aggression: Adaptive and maladaptive associations with adolescent friendship quality. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1153-1166.
Basow, S. A., Cahill, K. F., Phelan, J. E., Longshore, K., & McGillicuddy-DeLisi. A. (2007). Perceptions of relational and physical aggression among college students: Effects of gender of perpetrator. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 85-95.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta- analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147-163.
Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610- 617.
Crick, N. R., Bigbee, M. A., & Howes, C. (1996). Gender differences in children’s normative beliefs about aggression: How do I hurt thee? Let me count the ways. Child Development, 67, 1003-1014.
Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Mosher, M. (1997). Relational and overt aggression in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 579-588.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1996). Children's treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Developmental Psychopathology, 8(2), 367-380.
Dahlen, E. R., Czar, K. A., Prather, E., & Dyess, C. (2013). Relational aggression and victimization in college students. Journal of College Student Development, 54(2), 140-154.
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social- information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146-1158.
Elsaesse, C., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D. (2013). The role of the school environment in relational aggression and victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(2), 235-249.
French, D. C., Jansen, E. A., & Pidada, S. (2002). United States and Indonesian children’s and adolescents’ reports of relational aggression by disliked peers. Child Development, 73(4), 1143- 1150.
Frodi, A., Macaulay, J., & Thome, P. R. (1977). Are women always less aggressive than men? A review of the experimental literature. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 634-660.
Garandeau, C. F., Ahn, H. J., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). The social status of aggressive students across contexts: The role of classroom status hierarchy, academic achievement, and grade. Developmental psychology, 47(6), 1699-1710.
Hartup, W. W. (1974). Aggression in childhood: Developmental perspectives. American Psychologist, 29, 336-341.
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 213-235.
Karriker-Jeffe, K., Foshee, V. A., Ennett, S. T., & Suchindran, C. (2008). The development of aggression during adolescence: Sex differences in trajectories of physical and social aggression among youth in rural areas. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,
Kawabata, Y., Alink, R. A., Tseng, W. L., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Crick, N. R. (2011). Maternal and paternal parenting styles associated with relational aggression in children and adolescents: A conceptual analysis and meta-analytic review. Developmental
Kolbert, J. B., Field, J. E., Crothers, L. M., & Schreiber, J. B. (2010). Femininity and depression mediated by social and relational aggression in late adolescence. Journal of School Violence, 9(3), 289-302.
Leff, S. S., Waasdorp, T. E., & Crick, N. R. (2010). A review of existing relational aggression programs: Strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 508-535.
Marsee, M. A., Kimons, E. R., & Frick, P. J.(2004). Peer conflict scale. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Oreans.
Mathieson, L. C., & Crick, N. R. (2010). Reactive and proactive subtypes of relational and physical aggression in middle childhood: Links to concurrent and longitudinal adjustment. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 601-611.
Ostrov, J. M., Woods, K. E., Jansen, E. A., Casas, J. F., & Crick, N. R. (2004). An observational study of delivered and received aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment in preschool: ‘This white crayon doesn’t work.’ Early Childhood Rese
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40(3), 378-387.
Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Farver, J. M. (2000). Correlates of victimization in Chinese children's peer groups. Paper presented at the meeting of ISSBD ⅪⅤ, Beijing.
Smith, R. L., Rose, A. J., & Schwartz-Mette, R. A. (2010). Relational and overt aggression in childhood and adolescence: Clarifying mean- level gender differences and associations with peer acceptance. Social Development, 19(2), 243- 269.
Troop-Gordon, W., & Gerardy, H. (2012). Parents’ beliefs about peer victimization and children’s socio-emotional development. Journal of Applied Development, 33(1), 40-52.
Wang, F. M., Chen, J. Q., Xiao, W. Q., Ma, Y. T., & Zhang, M. (2012). Peer physical aggression and its association with aggressive beliefs, empathy, self-control, and cooperation skills among students in a rural town of China. Journal of Interpersonal Viol
Weber, D., & Kurpius, S. R. (2011). The importance of self-beliefs on relational aggression of college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(13), 2735-2743.
Williams, K. R., & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S14-S21.
Wyatt, T. J. (2010). A sex-based examination of violence and aggression perceptions among adolescents: An interactive qualitative analysis. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 823-851.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger, T. C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 421-452.

구매하기 (4,900)

장바구니

국문초록

영문초록

목차

키워드

참고문헌 (51건)