기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
장바구니
 고객센터
본문검색
  • 검색 히스토리
실시간 인기검색어
서지반출
Future Directions of Mobile Learning Based on User Acceptance
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • Future Directions of Mobile Learning Based on User Acceptance
ㆍ 저자명
Myung Hee Kang,Teresa Liew Bao Yng,Ji Won You
ㆍ 간행물명
Eastwest Education
ㆍ 권/호정보
2013년|30권 (통권30호)|pp.19-39 (21 pages)
ㆍ 발행정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소|한국
ㆍ 파일정보
정기간행물|ENG|
PDF텍스트(0.24MB)
ㆍ 주제분야
교육학
서지반출

영문초록

As wireless technology becomes more advanced, mobile devices become more affordable and easier to use. Due to the technological change, mobile learning gets more attention from both researchers and practitioners looking for ways to utilize it in teaching and learning. Although the researches provide very valuable insights into trends and issues of mobile learning, there are few articles that examine user acceptance of mobile learning. In order to adopt and disseminate mobile learning in the field of education, investigating the readiness and intentions of potential learners is crucial. Previous research indicated that little research had been conducted on the factors affecting users’ acceptance of, and intentions for, adopting mobile learning (Liu, Han & Li, 2010; Wang, Wu & Wang, 2009; Wang & Wang, 2010). Hence, this paper aims to identify the directions of initiating and implementing mobile learning. The study attempts to answer the following questions: (1) What kinds of research models are proposed to understand users’ acceptance of, and intentions for using mobile learning? (2) What are the variables in the models investigated? (3) What types of research methods have been employed in each article? (4) What are the research outcomes? Related articles from three reputable academic databases from the beginning of 2000 to December 2013 were retrieved and analyzed. This study would help developers and stakeholders better understand the user acceptance process to support their decision making and planning on mobile learning.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Research Questions
III. Literature Review
IV. Method
V. Data Analysis and Results
VI. Discussion
VII. Recommendation for Future Research
VIII. Conclusion
References

키워드

User acceptancemobile learningcurrent trendsfuture directions

참고문헌 (61건)

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 2, 179–211.
  • Ally, M. (Ed.). (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca University Press.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : asocial cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice Hall.
  • Bao, Y., Xiong, T., Hu, Z., & Kibelloh, M. (2013). Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self-efficacy in mobile learning adoption. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 111-132.
  • Blessinger, K., & Olle, M. (2004). Content analysis of the leading general academic databases. Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services, 28, 4, 373-394.
  • Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students' ICt skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 303-314.
  • Chang, C., & Hsu, C. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation-annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning ,24, 155-180.
  • Chang, C., Yan, C., & Tseng, J. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 809-826.
  • Chen, H., & Huang, H. (2010). User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: Design and Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 70-77.
  • Cheng, S., Hwang, W., Wu, S., Shadiev, R., & Xie, C. (2010). A mobile device and online system with contextual familiarity and its effects on English learning on campus. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 93-109.
  • Compeau, R., Higgins, A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2, 145–158.
  • Davis, D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 319–339.
  • Davis, D., Bagozzi, P., & Warshaw, R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 14, 1111–1132.
  • Dillin, A., & Morris, G. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3-32.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hwang, G., & Tsai, C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 65-70.
  • Hung, J., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003-2008: a categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computer Higher Educations, 24, 1-17.
  • Irby, L., & Strong, R. (2013). Agricultural education students' acceptance and self-efficacy of mobile technology in classroom. NACTA Journal, 82-87.
  • Ismail, I., Bokhare, F., Azizan, N., & Azman, N. (2013). Teaching via mobile phone: A case study on Malaysian Teachers' technology acceptance and readiness. Journal of Educators Online, 10(10), 1-38.
  • Iqba, S. & Qureshi, A. (2012). M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 147-164.
  • Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  • Joo, Y. J., Kim, H., & Lim E. (2012). Analysis of factors affecting adoption of mobile learning in cyber university. Korean Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 28(1), 79-102.
  • Jung, H. (2009). Determinants influencing mobile-learning for English learning. English 21, 22, 2, 234-255.
  • Korea Education and Research Information Service. (2011). Adapting education to the information age [White paper]. Retrieved from http://english.keris.or.kr/whitepaper/WhitePaper_eng_2011_wpap.pdf
  • Knutsson, O., Nissila, N., Rasanen, M., & Carlsson, J. (2011). Participatory design of a mobile application for teenagers' language homework, Proceedings of the 10thWorld Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Beijing, China.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile usability and user experience. In A. Kukulska-Hulme, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp.45–56). London:Routledge.
  • Kukulska-Hulme, A., Pettit, J., Bradley, L., Carvalho, A., Herrington, A., Kennedy, M., & Walker, A. (2011). Mature students using mobile devices in life and learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 3(10), 18-52.
  • Lee, M., & Son, Y. (2012). A study on the adoption of SNS for smart learning in the 'Creativity Activty'. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 1-18.
  • Lee, Y., Kozar, A., & Larsen, T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and the future. Communications of the Association of Information Systems, 12, 752-780.
  • Liew, T., You, J., & Kang, M. (2012). User acceptance for mobile learning: A review and future directions. Proceedings of 10th Anniversary International Conference of Hanyang Cyber University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Liew, T., Kang, M., Yoo, E. & You, J. (2013). Investigating the determinants of mobile learning acceptance in Korea. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013 (pp.1424-1430). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Lincoln, S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010) Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: a literature review. Campus-Wide Information System, 27(4), 210-226.
  • Lowenthal, N. (2010). Using mobile learning: Determinates impacting behavioral intention. The American Journal of Distance Education, 24, 195-206.
  • MacCallum, K., & Kinshuk. (2008). Mobile technology in collaboration: Evaluation of a web-based discussion board. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization, 2(4), 318–328.
  • Moore, C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 192–222.
  • Motiwalla, V. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581-596.
  • Noh, K., Ju, S., & Jung, J. (2011). An exploratory study on concept and realization conditions of smart learning. The Journal of Digital Policy and Management, 9(2), 79-99.
  • O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Retrieved May 15, 2012, from .
  • Park, S. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university student’s behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
  • Park, S., Nam, M., & Cha, S. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.
  • Pedersen, E., & Ling, R. (2003). Modifying adoption research for mobile internet service adoption: cross-disciplinary interactions. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-36), Big Island, HI. Los Alomotos, CA: IEE
  • Phuangthong, D., & Malisawan, S. (2005). A study of behavioral intention for 3G mobile internet technology: Preliminary research on mobile learning. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society.
  • Pierroux, P. (2008) Extending meaning from museum visits through the use of wikis and mobile blogging. Paper presented at ICLS 2008: International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Richey, C., Klein, D., & Nelson, A. (2003). Developmental research. Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen(Ed.). Hand book of research for educational communications and technology (pp.1099-1130). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc
  • Richey, C., & Nelson, A. (1996). Developmental research. In D. Jonassen(Ed.), Hand book of research for educational communications and technology (pp.1213-1245). London:Macmillan.
  • Rogers, M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.).New York: Free Press. Siau, K., Lim, P., & Shen, Z. (2001). Mobile commerce: promises, challenges, and research agenda. Journal of Database Management, 12, 3, 4–13.
  • Straub, T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.
  • Strong, R., Ho, P., Odom, F., & Irby, L. (2013). A course focused on the critical issues in agriculture: Students' acceptance and use of mobile learning. NACTA Journal, 57(4), 57-64.
  • Suki, M., & Suki, M. (2011). Users’ behavior towards ubiquitous m-learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12, 118-129
  • Taylor, J., and Bogdan R. (1984), Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings, New York: Wiley.
  • Taylor, S., & Todd, A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 4, 144–176.
  • Thompson, L., Higgins, A., & Howell, M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 1, 124–143.
  • Triandis, C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, Canada: Brooke/Cole.
  • Um, M., & Kim, M. (2007). A study on factors affecting users’ satisfaction level in using PMP for learning purpose. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Science, 10, 1, 77-88.
  • Valdivia, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2007). Face-to-face collaborative learning in computer science classes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(3), 434-440.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, G., Davis, B., & Davis, D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  • Wang, H., & Wang, S. (2010). User acceptance of mobile internet based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: Investigating the determinants and gender differences. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(3), 415-426.
  • Wu, W., Wu, Y., Chen, C., Kao, H., & Lin, C. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Educations, 59, 817-827.
  • Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning, British Journal of Educational Technology. 40(1), 92-118.
구매하기 (5,000)
장바구니
추천 연관논문