기관회원 [로그인]
소속기관에서 받은 아이디, 비밀번호를 입력해 주세요.
개인회원 [로그인]

비회원 구매시 입력하신 핸드폰번호를 입력해 주세요.
본인 인증 후 구매내역을 확인하실 수 있습니다.

회원가입
서지반출
면담의 환경적 특성 및 아동의 의도적 통제 수준이 아동 기억의 정확성에 미치는 영향
[STEP1]서지반출 형식 선택
파일형식
@
서지도구
SNS
기타
[STEP2]서지반출 정보 선택
  • 제목
  • URL
돌아가기
확인
취소
  • 면담의 환경적 특성 및 아동의 의도적 통제 수준이 아동 기억의 정확성에 미치는 영향
  • The Effects of Interview’s Social Support and Children’s Effortful Control: The Accuracy of Children’s Recollection
저자명
곽금주,김연수,이승진
간행물명
인간발달연구KCI
권/호정보
2015년|22권 1호(통권61호)|pp.167-193 (27 pages)
발행정보
한국인간발달학회|한국
파일정보
정기간행물|KOR|
PDF텍스트(0.76MB)
주제분야
사회과학
서지반출

국문초록

본 연구는 아동의 오기억 형성에 영향을 미칠 수 있는 다양한 요인들 중에서 면담자의 라포 형성 형태와 면담자의 태도를 달리하여 그와 같은 면담의 구조적 특성이 아동의 암시적 정보에 대한 저항 정도에 어 떤 영향을 미치는가를 탐색해 보고자 하였다. 수도권에 거주중인 만 4-12세 아동 128명을 라포 형성의 형 태와 면담자의 태도 특성에 따라 무선 할당하였다. 아동의 연령, 개방형 또는 직접형의 라포 형성의 형 태, 그리고 지지적, 중립적, 비지지적인 면담자의 태도를 각각 조작하여 이에 따른 아동 기억 회상 보고 의 정확성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 연구 결과, 면담자의 지지가 제공되는 조건에서 그렇지 않은 조건에 비 해 암시적 질문에 대한 저항 수준이 더 높은 것으로 나타나 선행 연구의 결과를 지지하였다. 또한 선행 연구와 동일하게 어린 아동일수록 면담자의 지지에 상대적으로 더 많은 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났고 미 취학 아동에게 기대되지 못했던 개방형 라포 형성의 효과도 면담자의 지지가 제공되는 조건에서는 유의 미하게 증가하였다. 한편 본 연구에서는 암시적 정보에 대한 아동의 저항력이 면담자의 태도와 면담 전 라포 형성의 형태에 의해 달라질 수 있음이 증명됨과 동시에 아동의 개인차 특성에 따라서도 상이할 수 있음이 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과를 바탕으로 진술 조사 맥락에서 피해 아동의 개인차 특성을 고려한 차 별화된 면담 구성과 면담자 태도의 중요성에 대해 논의하였다.

영문초록

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of interviewer’s social support and questioning style on the accuracy of children’s recollection during rapport-building sessions. 128 children aged four to twelve interacted with a researcher and interviewed with another researcher during a science experiment event. Overall, the results suggested that more accurate information in the child’s voluntary responses was associated with open-style rapport-building and interviewer’s social support, regardless of the children’s ages. Interestingly, the accuracy of children’s false memory differed as a function of the characteristics of children’s temperament. Specifically, in a closed rapport-building condition, children evaluated comparatively lower on effortful control dimension than children evaluated as higher on the dimension recalled information with more errors. Ultimately, this study identified a number of significant variables that affect how children report an experience. The findings are especially marked for children with lower effortful control and who are in special need of support and for those with an open style rapport-building where the interviewer’s sincere support might be more important.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과 및 해석
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (73건)

  • 곽금주, 이승진 (2006). 아동 증언에 영향을 주는 요인들. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 25(2), 13-40.
  • 김미영, 김경하, 전우병, 김시업 (2004). 인지면담기법이 아동과 성인의 사건회상 정확성에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(2), 137-151.
  • 김시업, 문옥영, 김기민 (2010). 수사 면담시 라포가 진술의 양에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(1), 149-166.
  • 김연수, 곽금주 (2013). 아동의 기질과 어머니의 온정적 양육태도가 아동의 생활만족도에 미치는 효과. 인간발달연구, 20(1), 29-49.
  • 김태경, 이영호 (2010). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술양상. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(1), 301-325.
  • 이승진, 곽금주 (2013). 아동의 수줍음 경향, 면담자의 지지, 출처 감찰 훈련이 스트레스적 사건에 대한 아동의 자유 회상 보고에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 26(4), 59-80.
  • 이승진, 곽금주 (2014). 면담자의 라포 형성 형태, 소요 시간 및 아동의 평소 불안 수준이 사건 기억에 미치는 영향. 인간발달연구, 21(2), 133-157.
  • 조은경 (2004). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술 타당도 분석 및 활용 방안에 관한 연구. 연구총서, 04-47, 11-113.
  • Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Akehurst, L., & Fluck, M. (2008). How interviewers’ nonverbal behaviors can affect children’s perceptions and suggestibility. Journal Of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(1), 17-39.
  • Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). A state of high anxiety: How non supportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 963-974.
  • Bottoms, B. L., Quas, J. A., & Davis, S. L. (2007). The influence of interviewer-provided social support on children's suggestibility, memory and disclosures. In M-E Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. Cederbord (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Discloser, delay, and denial (pp.135-157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (2004). Forensic developmental psychology: unveiling four scientific misconceptions. Current Directions in Psychology, 13, 229-232.
  • Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Hembrooke, H. (2002). The nature of children’s true and false narratives. Developmental Review, 22(3), 520- 554.
  • Burleson, B. R., Albrecht, T. L., Goldsmith, D. J., & Sarason, I. G. (1994). The communication of social support. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communicatingsocial support: Messages, interactions, relationships and community (pp. xi-xxx). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Carter, C. A., Bottoms, B. L., & Levine, M. (1996). Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 335-358.
  • Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ceci, S. J., Huffman, M. L. C., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event: Source misattributions among preschoolers. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 3, 388-407.
  • Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Malloy, L. C., & Allhusen, V. D. (2004). Verbal ability, self-control, and close relationships with parents protect children against misleading suggestions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1037-1058.
  • Davis, S. L., & Bottoms, B. L. (2002). Effects of social support on children's eyewitness reports: A test of the underlying mechanism. Law and Human Behavior, 26(2), 185-215.
  • Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1997). Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 633-652.
  • Eisenberg, N. A., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 136-157.
  • Engelberg, E., & Christianson, S. Å. (2002). Stress, trauma, and memory. In M. L. Eisen, J. A. Quas, & G. S. Goodman, (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp.143-163). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Garven, S., Wood, J. M., & Malpass, R. S. (2000). Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children's mundane and fantastic claims. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 38-49.
  • Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. .S., & Shaw, J. S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effects of interviewing techniques from the McMartin preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347-359.
  • Geddie, L., Fradin, S., & Beer, J. (2000). Child characteristics which impact accuracy of recall and suggestibility in preschoolers: Is age the best predictor?. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(2), 223-235.
  • Giles, J. W., Gopnik, A., & Heyman, G. D. (2002). Source monitoring reduces the suggestibility of preschool children. Psychological Science, 13(3), 288-291.
  • Goodman, G. S., & Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 1-19. (Reprinted in V. V. L. Gayathri (Ed.), Child witness: Legal issues. India: AMICUS Books].
  • Goodman, G. S., & Reed, R. S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317-332.
  • Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwartz- Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children’s testimony about a stressful event: Improving children’s reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69-99.
  • Gordon, B. N., Baker-Ward, L., & Ornstein, P. A. (2001). Children's testimony: A review of research on memory for past experiences. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 4, 157-181.
  • Greenstock, J., & Pipe, M. E. (1997). Are two heads better than one? Peer support and children's eyewitness reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(6), 461-483.
  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(3), 303-314.
  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 215-221.
  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. A handbook. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Home Office (2002). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance for vulnerable or intimidated witnesses, including children. London: Home Office Communication Directorate.
  • Huffman, M. L. C., Crossman, A. M., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). “Are false memories permanent?”: An investigation of the long-term effects of source misattributions. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 482-490.
  • Kanaya, T., Ceci, S. J, & Scullin, M. H. (2002). The rise and fall of IQ in special ed: Historical trends and their implications. Journal of School Psychology, 41(6), 453-465.
  • Kochanska, G., Murray, K. T., & Harlan, E. T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220-232.
  • Krähenbühl, S., & Blades, M. (2006). The effect of interviewing techniques on young children's responses to questions. Child: Care, Health and Development, 32(3), 321-331.
  • Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Boat, B., & Everson, M. D. (1996). Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(12), 1251- 1259.
  • Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (1998). Conducting investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(8), 813-823.
  • Lowenstein, J. A., Blank, H., & Sauer, J. D. (2010). Uniforms affect the accuracy of children's eyewitness identification decisions. Intelligence, 7(1), 59-73.
  • McCarthy, D. (1972). McCarthy scales of children's abilities. Psychological Corporation.
  • Melinder, A., Endestad, T., & Magnussen, S. (2006). Relations between episodic memory, suggestibility, theory of mind, and cognitive inhibition in the preschool child. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 485-495.
  • Melinder, A., Scullin, M. H., Gunnerød, V., & Nyborg, E. (2005). Generalizability of a 2-factor measure of young children’s suggestibility in Norway and the USA. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 11, 123-145.
  • Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Enhancing children’s narratives in investigative interviews. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1631- 1648.
  • Poole, D. A. & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: a guide for helping professionals. Washington DC.: American Psychological Association.
  • Putnam, S. P., & Rothbart, M. K. (2006). Development of short and very short forms of the children’s behavior questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 103- 113.
  • Quas, J. A., & Lench, H. C. (2007). Arousal at encoding, arousal at retrieval, interviewer support, and children’s memory for a mild stressor. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 289- 305.
  • Quas, J. A., & Schaaf, J. M. (2002). Children’s memories of experienced and nonexperienced events following repeated interviews. Journal Of Experimental Child Psychology, 83(4), 304- 338.
  • Quas, J. A., Bauer, A. B., & Boyce, W. T. B. (2004). Physiological reactivity, social support, and memory in early childhood. Child Development, 75, 797-81.
  • Quas, J. A., Goodman, G. S., Bidrose, S., Pipe, M. E., Craw, S., & Ablin, D. (1999). Emotion and memory: Children's long-term remembering, forgetting, and suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 235-270.
  • Quas, J. A., Qin, J., Schaaf, J. M., & Goodman, G. S. (1997). Individual differences in children's and adults' suggestibility and false event memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 359-390.
  • Roberts, K. P., & Blades, M. (1999). Children's memory and source monitoring of real-life and televised events. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 575-596.
  • Roberts, K. P., Lamb, M. E., & Sternberg, K. J. (2004). The effects of rapport-building style on children’s reports of a staged event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 189-202.
  • Roebers, C. M., Schwarz, S., & Neumann, R. (2005). Social influence and children's event recall and suggestibility. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(1), 47-69.
  • Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: Origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122-135.
  • Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., Hershey, K., & Fisher, P. (2001). Investigations of temperament at 3-7 years. Child Development, 72, 1394-1408.
  • Salmon, K., Roncolato, W., & Gleitzman, M. (2003). Children's reports of emotionally laden events: Adapting the interview to the child. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 65-79.
  • Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E., & Moan, S. F. (1991). Children’s memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 682-691.
  • Schaaf, J. M., Goodman, G. S., & Alexander, K. (1999). Effects of repeated questions on children's memory and suggestibility about true and false events. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Schachar, R. J., & Logan, G. D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 26, 710-720.
  • Siegman, A. W., & Reynolds, M. (1984). The Facilitating Effects of Interviewer Rapport and the Paralinguistics of Intimate Communications. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2(1), 71-88.
  • Sondhi, V., & Gupta, A. (2005). The role of interviewer behavior in eyewitness suggestibility. The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 6(1), 1-19.
  • Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children. Palo Alto, Consulting Psychological Press.
  • Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Yudilevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Hovav, M. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children’s abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 1133-1146.
  • Stockdale, M. P. S. (Ed.). (1996). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies. Women and work: A research and policy series, 5. London: Sage Publications.
  • Thompson, W. C., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., & Lepore, S. J. (1997). What did the janitor do? Suggestive interviewing and the accuracy of children’s accounts. Law and Human Behaver, 21, 405-426.
  • Tobey, A. E., & Goodman, G. S. (1992). Children's eyewitness memory: Effects of participation and forensic context. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16(6), 779-796.
  • Warren, A. R., Woodall, C. E., Hunt, J. S., & Perry, N. W. (1996). “It sounds good in theory, but…”: Do investigative interviewers follow guidelines based on memory research?. Child Maltreatment, 1, 231-245.
  • Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. (1989). Analysis of the statements of victims, witnesses and suspects. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp.175-191). Springer Netherlands.
  • Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. L. (1986). A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 291-301.
구매하기 (5,600)
추천 연관논문